1At Sāvatthī.

“Mendicants, when what exists, because of grasping what and insisting on what, does someone regard things like this: ‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?”

“Our teachings are rooted in the Buddha. …”

“When form exists, because of grasping form and insisting on form … When consciousness exists, because of grasping consciousness and insisting on consciousness, someone regards it like this: ‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self.’

What do you think, mendicants? Is form permanent or impermanent?”

“Impermanent, sir.” …

“But by not grasping what’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, would you regard it like this: ‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?”

“No, sir.”

“Is feeling … perception … choices … consciousness permanent or impermanent?”

“Impermanent, sir.” …

“But by not grasping what’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, would you regard it like this: ‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?”

“No, sir.”

“Seeing this … They understand: ‘… there is no return to any state of existence.’”

1Sāvatthinidānaṁ.

"Kismiṁ nu kho, bhikkhave, sati, kiṁ upādāya, kiṁ abhinivissa: ‘etaṁ mama, esohamasmi, eso me attā’ti samanupassatī"ti?

Bhagavaṁmūlakā no, bhante, dhammā … pe …

"rūpe kho, bhikkhave, sati, rūpaṁ upādāya, rūpaṁ abhinivissa … pe … viññāṇe sati, viññāṇaṁ upādāya, viññāṇaṁ abhinivissa: ‘etaṁ mama, esohamasmi, eso me attā’ti samanupassati.

Taṁ kiṁ maññatha, bhikkhave, rūpaṁ niccaṁ vā aniccaṁ vā"ti?

"Aniccaṁ, bhante" … pe …

vipariṇāmadhammaṁ, api nu taṁ anupādāya etaṁ mama, esohamasmi, eso me attāti samanupasseyyāti?

"No hetaṁ, bhante".

"Vedanā … saññā … saṅkhārā … viññāṇaṁ niccaṁ vā aniccaṁ vā"ti?

"Aniccaṁ, bhante" … pe …

vipariṇāmadhammaṁ, api nu taṁ anupādāya etaṁ mama, esohamasmi, eso me attāti samanupasseyyāti?

"No hetaṁ, bhante".

"Evaṁ passaṁ … pe … nāparaṁ itthattāyāti pajānātī"ti.

Dutiyaṁ.